0-60 Times by Horsepower (2026 Data)
More horsepower should mean a quicker 0-60. It doesn't — at least not reliably. Line up 36 cars from a 169-hp Corolla to a 2,107-hp Rimac and sort them by power, and the 0-60 column refuses to fall in step: a 500-hp Mustang trails a 510-hp EV by more than a second, a 668-hp Cadillac ties a 523-hp BMW, and a 1,578-hp Bugatti loses to a 1,020-hp Tesla. Horsepower is one input. Weight, traction, drivetrain, and how the torque arrives decide the launch.
This is the companion to our 0-60 times by car database. That page ranks cars by their 0-60; this one sorts by horsepower on purpose, so you can watch power climb while acceleration doesn't — and see exactly why.
How to read this table
The table is sorted by horsepower, low to high — not by 0-60. That's the point: as you scroll down, power rises steadily, but the 0-60 column jumps around. Columns:
- hp / 1,000 lb is power-to-weight: horsepower ÷ curb weight × 1,000. It's a far better predictor of 0-60 than raw horsepower, though still not the whole story.
- 0-60 is labeled in the Basis column: Tested means an independent instrumented run (Car and Driver, MotorTrend, Edmunds, and similar); Claimed means the manufacturer's figure, which usually assumes a prepped surface and often a 1-foot rollout worth a couple tenths.
- Curb weights are approximate published/typical figures, used to illustrate power-to-weight — treat them as ballpark, not exact spec.
0-60 by horsepower: 36 cars, sorted by power
| Model | HP | Weight (lb) | hp / 1,000 lb | 0-60 | Drivetrain | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toyota Corolla | 169 | 3,150 | 54 | 7.8s | FWD gas | Tested |
| Honda Civic (1.5T) | 180 | 2,950 | 61 | 7.0s | FWD gas | Tested |
| Mazda MX-5 Miata | 181 | 2,340 | 77 | 5.7s | RWD gas | Tested |
| Honda Civic Si | 200 | 2,950 | 68 | 6.8s | FWD gas | Tested |
| Subaru GR86 / BRZ | 228 | 2,830 | 81 | 5.4s | RWD gas | Tested |
| Toyota Camry (AWD hybrid) | 232 | 3,600 | 64 | 6.9s | AWD hybrid | Tested |
| Volkswagen Golf GTI | 241 | 3,150 | 77 | 5.6s | FWD gas | Tested |
| Subaru WRX | 271 | 3,300 | 82 | 5.4s | AWD gas | Tested |
| Toyota GR Corolla | 300 | 3,250 | 92 | 4.9s | AWD gas | Tested |
| Honda Civic Type R | 315 | 3,180 | 99 | 5.0s | FWD gas | Tested |
| Volkswagen Golf R | 328 | 3,400 | 96 | 4.7s | AWD gas | Tested |
| Toyota GR Supra 3.0 | 382 | 3,400 | 112 | 3.9s | RWD gas | Tested |
| Nissan Z Performance | 400 | 3,500 | 114 | 4.5s | RWD gas | Tested |
| Ford Mustang GT (5.0) | 480 | 3,800 | 126 | 4.3s | RWD gas | Tested |
| Ford Mustang Dark Horse | 500 | 3,990 | 125 | 4.0s | RWD gas | Tested |
| Tesla Model 3 Performance | 510 | 4,050 | 126 | 2.9s | AWD EV | Claimed |
| BMW M3 Competition xDrive | 523 | 3,900 | 134 | 3.4s | AWD gas | Tested |
| Cadillac CT5-V Blackwing | 668 | 4,150 | 161 | 3.4s | RWD gas | Tested |
| Chevrolet Corvette Z06 | 670 | 3,600 | 186 | 2.6s | RWD gas | Claimed |
| Dodge Charger Daytona Scat Pack | 670 | 5,800 | 116 | 3.3s | AWD EV | Claimed |
| Mercedes-AMG C63 S E Performance | 671 | 4,750 | 141 | 3.3s | AWD PHEV | Claimed |
| BMW M5 | 717 | 5,390 | 133 | 3.4s | AWD PHEV | Claimed |
| Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat | 717 | 4,450 | 161 | 3.6s | RWD gas | Tested |
| Ford F-150 Raptor R | 720 | 5,950 | 121 | 3.6s | 4WD gas | Tested |
| McLaren 750S | 740 | 3,060 | 242 | 2.7s | RWD gas | Claimed |
| Ferrari 296 GTB | 819 | 3,300 | 248 | 2.9s | RWD PHEV | Claimed |
| Lamborghini Temerario | 907 | 3,900 | 233 | 2.7s | AWD PHEV | Claimed |
| Ferrari SF90 Stradale | 986 | 3,700 | 266 | 2.5s | AWD PHEV | Claimed |
| Lamborghini Revuelto | 1,001 | 3,900 | 257 | 2.6s | AWD PHEV | Claimed |
| Tesla Model S Plaid | 1,020 | 4,830 | 211 | 1.99s | AWD EV | Claimed |
| Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 | 1,064 | 3,670 | 290 | 2.3s | RWD gas | Claimed |
| Porsche Taycan Turbo GT | 1,092 | 5,100 | 214 | 2.1s | AWD EV | Tested |
| Lucid Air Sapphire | 1,234 | 5,300 | 233 | 1.89s | AWD EV | Tested |
| Chevrolet Corvette ZR1X | 1,250 | 3,900 | 321 | 1.68s | AWD hybrid | Claimed |
| Bugatti Chiron Super Sport | 1,578 | 4,400 | 359 | 2.4s | AWD gas | Claimed |
| Rimac Nevera R | 2,107 | 5,100 | 413 | 1.66s | AWD EV | Tested |
Want to run the math on your own car? Drop your horsepower and weight into the power-to-weight ratio calculator, then estimate a quarter-mile ET from the same two numbers with the quarter mile calculator.
Four proofs: same power, very different 0-60
The clearest way to see that horsepower isn't the answer is to hold power roughly constant and change everything else.
Pair A — 500 hp RWD vs 510 hp AWD EV. The 500-hp Ford Mustang Dark Horse runs 4.0s to 60. The Tesla Model 3 Performance makes almost the same power, 510 hp, and does it in 2.9s — 1.1 seconds quicker on near-identical horsepower. All-wheel traction and instant electric torque put the power down from the first inch; the rear-drive Mustang spends the launch managing wheelspin.
Pair B — 523 hp AWD vs 668 hp RWD, same 0-60. The BMW M3 Competition xDrive (523 hp) and the Cadillac CT5-V Blackwing (668 hp) both hit 60 in 3.4s. The Cadillac has 145 more horsepower and gains nothing, because a rear-drive car can only put so much power to the ground from a standstill. Past the traction limit, extra hp doesn't shorten 0-60 — it just makes more noise.
Pair C — 1,020 hp EV vs 1,064 hp combustion. The Tesla Model S Plaid (1,020 hp) reaches 60 in 1.99s. The Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 makes more power — 1,064 hp — and is 0.3s slower at 2.3s. Same story, higher up the ladder: the AWD EV's launch beats the rear-drive V8's, regardless of the horsepower on paper.
Pair D — 1,020 hp EV beats 1,578 hp everything. The 1,578-hp Bugatti Chiron Super Sport has 558 more horsepower than the Plaid *and* a better power-to-weight ratio (359 vs 211 hp per 1,000 lb) — yet it's 0.4s slower to 60 (2.4s vs 1.99s). When even a huge power-to-weight advantage loses, you're looking at the real deciders: instant torque and traction off the line.
So what actually decides 0-60?
- Traction and drivetrain. Getting to 60 is mostly a question of how much power reaches the road, not how much the engine makes. AWD (and especially AWD EVs) launch without wheelspin; RWD and FWD cars hit a traction ceiling early. It's why a 300-hp AWD GR Corolla (4.9s) matches a 315-hp FWD Civic Type R (5.0s) despite less power.
- Weight. Mass blunts everything. The 670-hp Dodge Charger Daytona weighs about 5,800 lb and runs 3.3s; the 670-hp Corvette Z06 weighs 3,600 lb and runs 2.6s — same horsepower, 0.7s apart. The 717-hp BMW M5 (5,390 lb) ties the 523-hp M3 at 3.4s because the weight erases the extra power.
- Torque delivery. An electric motor makes peak torque at 0 rpm; a combustion engine has to rev into its band and shift through gears. That head start is worth tenths in the 0-60 window even before traction enters the picture.
- Being light beats being powerful-and-heavy. The 181-hp Mazda MX-5 (2,340 lb) out-accelerates the 200-hp Civic Si and the 232-hp Camry hybrid. The 740-hp McLaren 750S (3,060 lb) beats far more powerful cars because it barely weighs anything. Power-to-weight explains more than power ever will.
Claimed vs. measured: your car is the only number that counts
Every figure above is a manufacturer claim or a controlled independent test on prepped pavement with an expert launch. Your car on a real road is a different number. Here's a measured example from GPS timing: a 2022 BMW X6 M50i ran 3.51s to 60 mph on FastTrack — quicker than BMW's roughly 4.1-second claim. That's a FastTrack-measured result, not a spec sheet, and it cuts both ways: plenty of cars trail their claim once tires, weather, elevation, and your launch enter the equation.
Horsepower on a dyno and horsepower to the ground are two different things — which is exactly why measuring your own 0-60 tells you more than any spec table.
Measure your real 0-60 and power-to-weight
You don't need a drag strip or a dedicated box. FastTrack uses your iPhone's GPS and accelerometer to time 0-60, the quarter mile, and rolling pulls to within a few hundredths of a second. Run your car stock, work out its power-to-weight with the calculator, then re-run it after tires, a tune, or shedding weight — and see which change actually moved your 0-60.
Then put it on the board: post your run to the FastTrack leaderboards and compare against other owners of your exact car. For the full ranking by acceleration, see 0-60 times by car; for the machines at the very top, see the fastest cars of 2026.
FAQ
Does more horsepower mean a faster 0-60?
Not on its own. Horsepower is only useful once it reaches the road, so weight, traction, drivetrain, and torque delivery often matter more over the short 0-60 window. In this data a 1,020-hp Tesla Model S Plaid (1.99s) beats a 1,578-hp Bugatti Chiron Super Sport (2.4s), and a 523-hp BMW M3 ties a 668-hp Cadillac CT5-V Blackwing at 3.4s. Extra horsepower helps most at higher speeds — in the quarter mile and beyond — not necessarily off the line.
What matters more than horsepower for 0-60?
Three things. Traction and drivetrain decide how much power actually reaches the pavement — AWD and instant-torque EVs launch cleanly while RWD and FWD cars hit a grip ceiling. Weight determines how much work that power has to do; a 5,800-lb car needs far more power for the same result. And torque delivery matters, because an EV's instant peak torque beats an engine that has to rev and shift. Power-to-weight (hp per 1,000 lb) captures the first two better than raw horsepower.
What is a good horsepower-to-weight ratio?
As a rough guide from this list: around 60–90 hp per 1,000 lb is a quick everyday car (5–7 second range), 120–160 is genuine sports-car territory (mid-3s to low-4s), and above 200 is supercar and performance-EV ground (under 3 seconds). It's a strong predictor but not perfect — traction still caps how much of that ratio a car can use off the line, which is why some high-ratio rear-drive cars don't out-launch lower-ratio AWD ones. Calculate yours with the power-to-weight calculator.
Why are EVs so quick to 60 despite their weight?
Electric motors make maximum torque from 0 rpm and most quick EVs are all-wheel drive, so they convert power to forward motion instantly and without wheelspin or gear changes. That launch advantage is large enough to overcome a big weight penalty over 0-60: the 5,300-lb Lucid Air Sapphire runs 1.89s and the 5,100-lb Rimac Nevera R runs 1.66s. Over a longer run — the quarter mile or top speed — weight and aerodynamics claw some of that advantage back.
How do I find my car's real 0-60 and power-to-weight?
Measure the 0-60 with a GPS timing app like FastTrack on a safe, legal, flat road — let it auto-start on launch, run several passes, and average them. For power-to-weight, divide your car's horsepower by its curb weight and multiply by 1,000, or use the power-to-weight calculator. Comparing your measured 0-60 against your power-to-weight (and against the spec-sheet claim) is the fastest way to see whether traction, weight, or tuning is holding your car back.