0-60 Times by Car (2026 Database)
Looking up 0-60 mph times by car is one of the fastest ways to compare real-world acceleration, whether you're shopping, settling a debate, or benchmarking your own runs. This database ranks 50+ 2026 cars by 0-60, from 1.66-second hypercars down to the commuters most people actually drive, with quarter-mile, horsepower, price, and segment for context.
It's the companion to our quarter mile times by car database, 0-60 measures the launch and the first few gears, while the quarter mile tells you how a car keeps pulling. Read them together for the full picture.
How to read these numbers
Every 0-60 time is labeled in the Basis column: Claimed means the manufacturer's figure, Tested means an independent instrumented test (Car and Driver, MotorTrend, Edmunds, and similar). Prices are approximate US base MSRP as of August 2026, and quarter-mile times are shown where a claimed or tested figure exists. Manufacturer numbers use ideal conditions and often a 1-foot rollout that shaves a couple tenths, so your real result will vary with tires, launch, weather, and elevation. The only measured figure we present as FastTrack-measured is called out separately below, never mixed into the claimed list.
0-60 times by car: the 2026 ranking
Open data: download the full 0-60 database as CSV, free to reuse with credit to FastTrack.
| Car | 0-60 mph | Segment | ¼-mile | HP | Price (approx.) | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rimac Nevera R | 1.66s | Hypercar (EV) | 7.9s | 2,107 hp | ~$2,400,000 | Tested |
| Chevrolet Corvette ZR1X | 1.68s | Hypercar (hybrid AWD) | , | 1,250 hp | ~$180,000 | Claimed |
| Lucid Air Sapphire | 1.89s | Super sedan (EV) | , | 1,234 hp | ~$249,900 | Tested |
| Tesla Model S Plaid | 1.99s | Super sedan (EV) | 9.2s | 1,020 hp | ~$96,630 | Claimed |
| Porsche Taycan Turbo GT | 2.1s | Super sedan (EV) | 9.5s | 1,092 hp | ~$230,000 | Tested |
| Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 | 2.3s | Supercar | 9.6s | 1,064 hp | ~$180,000 | Claimed |
| Bugatti Chiron Super Sport | 2.4s | Hypercar | , | 1,578 hp | ~$4,000,000 | Claimed |
| Nissan GT-R Nismo | 2.5s | Sports | , | 600 hp | ~$220,000 | Tested |
| Ferrari SF90 Stradale | 2.5s | Supercar (hybrid) | 9.5s | 986 hp | ~$550,000 | Claimed |
| Chevrolet Corvette E-Ray | 2.5s | Sports (hybrid AWD) | 10.5s | 655 hp | ~$106,000 | Tested |
| Porsche 911 Turbo S | 2.6s | Sports | 10.1s | 640 hp | ~$230,000 | Claimed |
| Lamborghini Revuelto | 2.6s | Supercar (hybrid) | , | 1,001 hp | ~$610,000 | Claimed |
| Chevrolet Corvette Z06 | 2.6s | Sports | 10.6s | 670 hp | ~$110,000 | Claimed |
| McLaren W1 | 2.6s | Hypercar (hybrid) | , | 1,258 hp | ~$2,100,000 | Claimed |
| Lamborghini Temerario | 2.7s | Supercar (hybrid) | , | 907 hp | ~$350,000 | Claimed |
| McLaren 750S | 2.7s | Supercar | , | 740 hp | ~$330,000 | Claimed |
| Ferrari 296 GTB | 2.9s | Supercar (hybrid) | , | 819 hp | ~$340,000 | Claimed |
| Tesla Model 3 Performance | 2.9s | Sport sedan (EV) | , | 510 hp | ~$56,620 | Claimed |
| Mercedes-AMG GT 63 | 3.1s | GT coupe | , | 577 hp | ~$180,000 | Claimed |
| Ford Mustang GTD | 3.3s | Muscle | , | 815 hp | ~$325,000 | Claimed |
| Ford Mustang GT500 | 3.3s | Muscle | 10.6s | 760 hp | , | Tested |
| Dodge Charger Daytona Scat Pack | 3.3s | Muscle (EV) | , | 670 hp | ~$68,000 | Claimed |
| Mercedes-AMG C63 S E Performance | 3.3s | Sport sedan (PHEV) | , | 671 hp | ~$85,000 | Claimed |
| BMW M5 | 3.4s | Sport sedan (PHEV) | , | 717 hp | ~$120,000 | Claimed |
| BMW M4 Competition xDrive | 3.4s | Sports | 11.5s | 523 hp | ~$90,000 | Tested |
| Cadillac CT5-V Blackwing | 3.4s | Sport sedan | 11.2s | 668 hp | ~$100,000 | Tested |
| BMW M3 Competition xDrive | 3.4s | Sport sedan | 11.6s | 523 hp | ~$85,000 | Tested |
| Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 | 3.5s | Muscle | 11.4s | 650 hp | , | Tested |
| Audi RS7 | 3.5s | Sport sedan | 11.4s | 621 hp | ~$130,000 | Tested |
| Tesla Model Y Performance | 3.5s | SUV (EV) | , | 460 hp | ~$52,000 | Claimed |
| Ford F-150 Raptor R | 3.6s | Truck | , | 720 hp | ~$110,000 | Tested |
| Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat | 3.6s | Muscle | 11.2s | 717 hp | , | Tested |
| Toyota GR Supra 3.0 | 3.9s | Sports | 12.3s | 382 hp | ~$57,000 | Tested |
| Ford Mustang Dark Horse | 4.0s | Muscle | 12.3s | 500 hp | ~$64,000 | Tested |
| Ford Mustang GT (5.0) | 4.3s | Muscle | 12.4s | 480 hp | ~$45,000 | Tested |
| Nissan Z Performance | 4.5s | Sports | 12.9s | 400 hp | ~$54,000 | Tested |
| Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD | 4.6s | SUV (EV) | , | 384 hp | ~$50,000 | Claimed |
| Volkswagen Golf R | 4.7s | Hot hatch | 13.3s | 328 hp | ~$47,000 | Tested |
| Toyota GR Corolla | 4.9s | Hot hatch | 13.4s | 300 hp | ~$40,000 | Tested |
| Honda Civic Type R | 5.0s | Hot hatch | 13.5s | 315 hp | ~$47,000 | Tested |
| Subaru WRX | 5.4s | Sport sedan | 13.9s | 271 hp | ~$35,000 | Tested |
| Toyota GR86 / Subaru BRZ | 5.4s | Sports | 14.0s | 228 hp | ~$32,000 | Tested |
| Volkswagen Golf GTI | 5.6s | Hot hatch | 14.1s | 241 hp | ~$33,000 | Tested |
| Mazda MX-5 Miata | 5.7s | Roadster | 14.3s | 181 hp | ~$30,000 | Tested |
| Tesla Model 3 RWD | 5.8s | Sedan (EV) | , | 283 hp | ~$43,000 | Claimed |
| Honda Accord Hybrid | 6.7s | Sedan | , | 204 hp | ~$34,000 | Tested |
| Honda Civic Si | 6.8s | Sport sedan | 15.2s | 200 hp | ~$31,000 | Tested |
| Toyota Camry (AWD hybrid) | 6.9s | Sedan | , | 232 hp | ~$30,000 | Tested |
| Honda Civic (1.5T) | 7.0s | Compact | , | 180 hp | ~$26,000 | Tested |
| Toyota Corolla | 7.8s | Compact | , | 169 hp | ~$23,000 | Tested |
| Toyota RAV4 | 7.8s | SUV | , | 203 hp | ~$30,000 | Tested |
Planning a mod or cross-shopping two cars? Run the numbers through the power-to-weight ratio calculator, and estimate a quarter-mile ET from horsepower and weight with the quarter mile calculator.
What the ranking shows
The quickest 0-60 times belong to electric and hybrid machines. The Rimac Nevera R's independently tested 1.66 seconds leads outright, and the hybrid-AWD Chevrolet Corvette ZR1X follows with a claimed 1.68. Instant electric torque, all-wheel traction, and no gears to shift through compress the launch in a way even a 1,500-plus-horsepower combustion hypercar can't quite match.
Breadth is the useful part, though. A 2.5-second Corvette E-Ray and a 7.8-second Toyota Corolla are on the same list on purpose, because "0-60 times by car" is how people actually compare the machines they own or want. A Honda Civic at 7.0 seconds, a Mazda MX-5 at 5.7, and a Golf GTI at 5.6 are genuinely quick by any historical standard; the numbers only look modest next to the hypercars at the top.
Claimed vs. measured: the number that actually applies to you
Everything above is a manufacturer claim or a controlled independent test. Here's a measured counterexample from real GPS timing: a 2022 BMW X6 M50i ran 3.51s to 60 mph on FastTrack, quicker than BMW's roughly 4.1-second claim. That's a FastTrack-measured result, not a spec-sheet number, and it's the kind of proof a static database can't give you.
Manufacturer 0-60 figures assume prepped pavement, ideal weather, and often a 1-foot rollout worth a couple tenths. Independent tests are closer to reality but still run in good conditions by pro drivers. Your number depends on your tires, your launch, your elevation, and the day, which is the whole reason to measure it yourself.
Measure your real 0-60
You don't need a drag strip or a dedicated timing box. FastTrack uses your iPhone's GPS and accelerometer to time 0-60, the quarter mile, and rolling pulls, accurate to within a few hundredths of a second. Run your car stock, then again after tires, a tune, or pads, and see exactly what changed.
Then put it on the board: post your run to the FastTrack leaderboards, compare against other owners of your exact car, and find out where your real 0-60 lands versus the claim. For the drag-strip side of the story, see quarter mile times by car.
FAQ
What car has the fastest 0-60 time in 2026?
On this list, the Rimac Nevera R leads with an independently tested 1.66 seconds, aided by 2,107 horsepower. The Chevrolet Corvette ZR1X follows with a claimed 1.68 seconds, remarkable for a car near $180,000 rather than seven figures. Both rely on electrified all-wheel drive for instant, traction-limited launches.
Why is my car's real 0-60 slower than the listed time?
Listed times are best cases. Manufacturer figures use ideal surfaces, optimal weather, and often a 1-foot rollout that removes 0.2 to 0.4 seconds; even independent tests use good conditions and expert launches. On everyday roads with everyday tires, most cars trail the sheet by a couple tenths, which is why we labeled each figure Claimed or Tested and why measuring your own run matters.
What's a good 0-60 time for a normal car?
Context matters more than the raw number. Anything under about 6 seconds is genuinely quick for a street car, 6 to 8 seconds covers most modern sedans and crossovers (a Civic runs about 7.0, a Corolla about 7.8), and under 3 seconds is supercar and performance-EV territory. A car that felt fast a decade ago is merely average today, acceleration has moved that far.
Is 0-60 or the quarter mile the better measure of acceleration?
They measure different things. 0-60 captures the launch and the first gears, so it favors instant-torque EVs and AWD traction. The quarter mile rewards cars that keep pulling at higher speed, so a high-horsepower car can rank higher there than on 0-60. Read this database alongside quarter mile times by car for the complete picture.
How do I measure my car's 0-60 time accurately?
Use a GPS timing app like FastTrack on a safe, legal, flat stretch of road: let the app auto-start when it detects launch, run several passes, and average them to cut out noise. Note your tire type, temperature, and elevation so you can compare fairly over time, FastTrack keeps that history and ranks your runs against other owners of the same car.